Not signed in (Sign In)

The Pub: I'm from the future!

Bottom of Page

1 to 39 of 39

  1.  
    •  
      CommentAuthorstilton
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2010
     # 1
    •  
      CommentAuthorhessie
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2010
     # 2
    45, but if I hadn't removed my nose ring, I'd have 69.
    •  
      CommentAuthorminx
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2010
     # 3
    I'm a 94. All those damn text messages, I guess...
    •  
      CommentAuthorGeorge
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2010
     # 4
    32.
    •  
      CommentAuthorMr.MickMan
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2010
     # 5
    83
    • CommentAuthorsal
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2010 edited
     # 6
    62. I'm not from my own generation :(

    it was probably that I still have a land line and I haven't texted anyone today. none of my friends really use texting, argh

    s: "Oh god, there's a line here, 'Research shows that young people who graduate from college in a bad economy typically suffer long-term consequences -- with effects on their careers and earnings that linger as long as 15 years.' I hate life."
    j: "Well, we're not in a bad economy, we're in a terrible economy, so we should be good."
    •  
      CommentAuthorbatterpunts
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010 edited
     # 7
    44 answering strictly, according ot the letter of the question.

    63 if I don't count that TV program I caught during dinner, which lasts 1 hour. I don't actually watch TV, and only when me and my roommate eat together.

    AND

    89 if I count Last.fm as a social networking site such as the ones listed in the question.

    AND

    94 if I had played a video game yesterday if my video card's thermal paste wasn't fucked.

    Question 7, to which I answered "You think people of different races marrying each other is a doesn't make much difference for society." is a little fucked, because answering the neutral way should give the higher score, because really, who cares? Isn't the more Millennial viewpoint the one in which we don't care one way or another what one's race is?
    •  
      CommentAuthorvoz
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 8
    77, if i did this over the weekend, i could see very opposite outcome
  9.  # 9
    The "last 24 hours" specifier is a real killer.
    •  
      CommentAuthorstilton
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 10
    I have to say it's a good thing, but not for any warm fuzzy feelings.

    I think folks should intermarry, because it's good for the gene pool.
    •  
      CommentAuthorWookiee
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 11
    89... I'm wicked hip
    •  
      CommentAuthorscot
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 12
    92 which is no surprise because I roll with the times exactly 92 percent of the time all the time.
    •  
      CommentAuthorscot
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 13
    I'm not all that stoked about the fact that I watch more than an hour of TV sometimes though. For my true TV desires, I only need about 4 hours a week, so the rest is just waste.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJeff
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 14
    By television programing, does that mean live television or like hulu/itunes/etc.?
    •  
      CommentAuthorJeff
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 15
    Regardless, 94. Born in 79, I'm a cusper. I've never really identified with either generation though.
    •  
      CommentAuthorspot
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 16
    I was wondering that about television programming also, Jeff. Also, daily newspapers: what if I read them online? Does it have to be a physical paper? Those answers would change my score drastically.
    • CommentAuthorsal
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010 edited
     # 17
    yeah, I don't watch TV, I watch online so I didn't check that... and a news website is my homepage and three of my bookmarks but I haven't touched a newspaper in a long time.
    I think they worded it badly.

    I changed those answers and scored 32. what??
    •  
      CommentAuthorspot
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 18
    Yeah. Apparently millennials don't watch tv or read newspapers. Which leads me to believe if you watch or read online, you're supposed to answer "no".
    •  
      CommentAuthorsole
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 19
    It says do you watch "television programming" not do you watch "television". I can only assume specifically to account for other methods of delivery.

    Also: 81. Not caring about having a high-paying job is apparently a bad thing in this scenario. I did not realize Millennials were so venal.
    •  
      CommentAuthorAndrew
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 20
    I am 68. Get off my lawn.
    • CommentAuthorPete
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 21
    I got 99. I am slightly ashamed by this...
    •  
      CommentAuthorMr.MickMan
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 22
    Posted By: PeteI got 99. I am slightly ashamed by this...


    You should be
    •  
      CommentAuthorbkerouac
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 23
    I'm definitely not a millenial - scored 37
    Most likely "handicaps" to scoring higher

    No text messages on your cell phone in the past 24 hours (can't see them or type them, so what's the use?)
    No tattoos
    No piercings
    and in the one before last age bracket.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGeorge
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 24
    I've still got the lowest score thus far. This is cracking me up.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDor
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 25
    Posted By: GeorgeI'vestillgot the lowest score thus far. This is cracking me up.

    Crankypants!
    •  
      CommentAuthorJeff
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 26
    I don't have any piercings or tattoos and still scored high. Do millenials have those? Seems like gen x would have more.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJeff
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 27
    I don't really text message either. Meebo iPhone app!
    •  
      CommentAuthorstilton
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2010
     # 28
    I'm pretty sure my lack of tattoos kept me out of Pete's range.
  29.  # 29
    Posted By: GeorgeI'vestillgot the lowest score thus far. This is cracking me up.


    You're a classical gal.
    •  
      CommentAuthorbkerouac
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     # 30
    I am permantly amazed at how people manage to brand others, label them and place them in tight containers.
    •  
      CommentAuthorstilton
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     # 31
    I've decided to embrace it as absurdist theatre.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGeorge
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     # 32
    Posted By: stiltonI've decided to embrace it as absurdist theatre.
    +1
    •  
      CommentAuthorWookiee
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     # 33
    Posted By: bkerouacI am permantly amazed at how people manage to brand others, label them and place them in tight containers.

    •  
      CommentAuthorMr.MickMan
    • CommentTimeFeb 26th 2010
     # 34
    Posted By: Wookiee



    Is that Dave Matthews?
    •  
      CommentAuthorHrunting
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2010
     # 35
    I'm a 94. No tattoos. No piercings. Conservative. Give me money.
    •  
      CommentAuthorArk
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2010
     # 36
    I scored 14/100 on the Pew Research Center How Millennial Are You?
  37.  # 37
    I filled out what I though Ark would fill out, but I got a 2.

    Something it wrong, and I think it's the part of me that estimates other people.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGeorge
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2010
     # 38
    Posted By: batterpuntsI filled out what I though Ark would fill out, but I got a 2.

    Something it wrong, and I think it's the part of me that estimates other people.
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
    •  
      CommentAuthorbkerouac
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2010
     # 39
    I filled out what I though Ark would fill out, but I got a 2.

    Seems like Ark belongs to another millenium.

1 to 39 of 39

  1.